Have Reib Law Contact You
|
Children
|
|
Family Law Resources -
Children
|
What is mediation?Mediation is a process in which the parties to a divorce (or some other dispute) try to resolve their disagreements outside of court with the help of a mediator. The mediator cannot force a settlement, but tries to assist the parties to clarify their interests and work out their own solution. In divorce actions, mediators are often involved in custody and visitation disputes. They can also handle property disputes, support disputes, and other issues. If the parties resolve their disagreements through mediation, the lawyers for both the parties should be involved in finalizing and approving the agreement. Is mediation mandatory in divorce actions?That depends on the rules of the local court. Many courts require mediation of custody and visitation disputes--the mother and father must talk with a court-appointed mediator to try to resolve the problem before putting their case before a judge. The mediator cannot force a resolution, but the parties can be told to try mediation before coming to court. What is the professional background of divorce mediators?Most mediators are either lawyers or mental health professionals. Some court-related mediators have degrees in social work or psychology. Private mediators are often lawyers, although many are mental health professionals. Mediators who are mental health professionals are not serving as therapists, and mediators who are lawyers are not serving as lawyers. Instead, they are professionals who are trying to help two (or more) people work out their differences. Mediators are generally not licensed or regulated by the state, although the ABA has adopted standards and many states do have some certification for court-mandated mediation. What are the advantages of mediation?Mediation often is cheaper and quicker than taking a case before a judge. A good mediator can help the parties build their problem-solving skills, and that can help them avoid later disputes. Most people who settle their cases through mediation leave the process feeling better than they would have felt if they had gone through a bitter court fight. What are the disadvantages of mediation?Mediation can be a problem if one or both parties are withholding information. For example, if the purpose of mediation is to settle financial issues and one party is hiding assets or income, the other party might be better off with a lawyer who can vigorously investigate the matter. Mediators are usually good at exploring the parties' needs, goals, and possible solutions, but mediators do not have the legal resources of a lawyer to look for hidden information. Another problem with mediation can arise if one party is very passive and likely to be bulldozed by the other. In that situation, the mediated agreement might be lopsided in favor of the stronger party. A good mediator, however, will see to it that a weaker party's needs are expressed and protected. Mediators should refuse to proceed with mediation if it looks as though one side will take improper advantage of the other. Some professionals think that mediation is not appropriate if the case involves domestic violence. One concern is that mediation will just provide a forum in which the abuser can harm the victim again. Another concern is that victims of physical abuse are not able to adequately express and protect their own interests. However, other professionals believe that disputes in families with a history of domestic violence can still be mediated, particularly if the abused party is not significantly intimidated by the other party. A final potential drawback to mediation is that if mediation does not succeed, the parties may have wasted time and money on the process and still face the expenses of a trial. American Bar Association Family Legal Guide Copyright © 2004 American Bar Association |
|
|
Family Law Resources -
Children
|
What are grandparents' rights to visitation?Although all states had statutes allowing grandparents to seek visitation with their grandchildren, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in 2000 that will make it more difficult for grandparents to obtain court-ordered visits with their grandchildren. In the case of Troxel v. Granville, the Court found that fit parents should be given more deference on decisions regarding with whom the child will associate than was provided by the Washington State law. The Court left open the possibility that some grandparents could obtain court-ordered visitation if, for example, the grandparents can show that they had a particularly strong relationship with their grandchildren, it would harm the child not to continue the relationship, and it is in the child's best interest to continue. The burden of proof is on the grandparents. May courts award grandparents custody of their grandchildren?Yes, but usually only if neither parent wants the children or if the parents are unfit. Courts examine such factors as the grandparents' age, health, and ability to care for the children. Courts will not deny grandparents custody because of their age, as long as they are healthy. Some custody disputes between grandparents and parents arise when the grandparents have been raising their grandchildren for a considerable length of time under an informal arrangement. The grandparents may have become the "psychological parents" of the grandchildren by the time the parent or parents seek to regain custody. In this circumstance, courts in many states will allow the grandparents to retain custody, even if the parents are fit. What are a stepparent's duties and rights?The responsibilities of a stepparent depend on state law. A stepparent is not usually liable for a spouse's child from another marriage, unless the stepparent has adopted the child. Until then, the child's biological parents are liable for his or her support. Some states, however, make stepparents liable for the stepchild's support as long as the stepparent and the stepchild are living together. A stepparent who does not adopt a spouse's child may not normally claim custody of the child if the marriage ends in divorce, although some states allow a stepparent to seek visitation. A stepchild does not share in the estate of a stepparent, unless the stepparent has provided for the stepchild in a will. However, unmarried stepchildren under eighteen may receive supplemental retirement benefits or survivor's benefits under Social Security. American Bar Association Family Legal Guide Copyright © 2004 American Bar Association |
|
Family Law Resources -
Children
|
How do courts set child support?Under federal law, all states have guidelines to determine child support. The guidelines are formulas that consider the income of the parties, the number of children, and perhaps some other factors. The formulas are based on studies of how much families ordinarily spend on child raising. The formulas try to approximate the proportion of parental income that would have been spent for support of the child if the family had not been divided by divorce. Courts plug numbers into the formula and come up with an amount of support that should be paid. The parties can argue that because of special circumstances, a court should order more or less support than the guideline amount. When working with guideline formulas, how are the parents' incomes determined?States vary, with some using the parents' net income, and others using the gross income. Gross income is the parents' income from all (or almost all) sources, including wages, investments, and other sources. Net income is equal to gross income minus federal and state income taxes, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, health insurance, and perhaps union dues. For self-employed persons, the determination of income may be complex. Courts will allow deductions of reasonable business expenses before determining net income. But courts may disallow unusually high business expenses and depreciation that reduce income artificially without hurting the parent's cash flow. Thus, certain expenses that are deductible for tax purposes may not be deductible from income for the purpose of setting child support. How much child support should a noncustodial parent expect to pay?That question is difficult to answer precisely because guidelines vary among states and because courts may depart from the guidelines. The percentage formulas differ from state to state, but some examples can be given. What is an example of a guideline for child support based on the income of only the noncustodial parent?On page 83 is a comparison chart showing the "percentage of obligor's income" guidelines that were in effect in Illinois and in New York in the year 2003: Percentage of Obligor's Income Guidelines | Number of children | Percent of supporting party's net income | | | Illinois | New York | | 1 | 20% | 17% | | 2 | 28% | 25% | | 3 | 32% | 29% | | 4 | 40% | 31% | | 5 | 45% | 35% for 5 or more children | | | 50% for 6 or more children | |
Under this guideline, if a noncustodial parent (supporting party) in Illinois had a net income of $40,000, the annual level of child support would be $8,000 for one child; $10,000 for two children; $12,800 for three children; and so on. What's an example of a support formula based on the incomes of both parents?Support guidelines based on the incomes of both parents often are referred to as income shares models. Under these guidelines, the court first adds the income of both parents. Then the court consults a long table--or a computer program--that assesses the total obligation of support as a percentage of the combined incomes and the number of children. Generally, the percentage drops as the combined incomes rise, on the assumption that financially well-off parents spend a smaller portion of their incomes on their children than parents who are less well off. The court multiplies the combined incomes by the percent figure and obtains a dollar amount. Then the responsibility to pay that support is divided between the parents in proportion to each parent's incomes. Here is an example using Colorado's child support schedules. Assume a father and mother have two children and a combined annual gross income of $60,000--$40,000 earned by the father and $20,000 earned by the mother. The schedules put the guideline amount for support at $13,092 per year ($1,091 per month). Since the father earns two-thirds of the parties' combined income, he would pay two-thirds of the children's support ($8,728 a year) and the mother would pay one-third ($4,364). If one parent had primary custody of the children, the other probably would make a cash payment to that parent. The parent with primary custody probably would not make a cash payment as such, but would be presumed to be spending that amount on the children. What are reasons for ordering more support than the guideline amount?This depends, in part, on what expenses the guidelines include. Some common reasons for giving support above the base guideline amount include childcare expenses, high medical or dental expenses of the child that are not covered by insurance, and voluntary unemployment or underemployment of the parent who is supposed to pay support. Expenses for summer camps and private schools also might be a basis for setting higher support levels, particularly if private schools or summer camps were part of the family's lifestyle during the marriage. What are reasons for setting support below the guideline amount?Again, this varies from state to state, but common reasons for setting support below the guideline amounts include support obligations from earlier marriages and large debts related to family expenses to pay off. If the support guidelines are based on the income of only the noncustodial parent and if the custodial parent has an unusually high income, then the noncustodial parent can argue that the custodial parent's income is a reason for setting support below the guidelines. Also, if the guidelines do not have a cap or maximum level of income to which they apply, the high income of the noncustodial parent may be a basis for setting support below the guidelines. For example, using the Illinois guidelines described earlier, if a noncustodial parent has three children and an annual net income of $200,000, that parent may argue that the children do not need the $64,000 per year that the guidelines call for. Is child support paid while the child is with the noncustodial parent for summer vacation or long breaks?In most cases, yes. Courts figure that many major expenses for the benefit of the child--such as rent, mortgage, utilities, clothes, and insurance--have to be paid whether the child is with the custodial parent or not. So, usually, a full support payment is due. On the other hand, the parties--with the court's approval--may agree on payments in different amounts during vacation periods when the child is with the noncustodial parent. The lower amount for vacation periods with the noncustodial parent might reflect savings to the custodial parent for food expenses or childcare. How is child support enforced if a parent does not pay?The state and federal governments have a variety of techniques for enforcing payments of child support. The most common is a wage deduction, by which the employer sends a portion of the parent's wages to a state agency that then sends the money to the parent who has custody of the child. A federal law requires that after 1994, all child support orders must provide for an automatic wage deduction unless the parties have agreed otherwise or unless a court waives the automatic order. The state also can intercept the federal and state tax refunds of persons who have not paid support. Liens can be placed on property, such as real estate and automobiles. A parent who has not paid support can be held in contempt of court, which may result in a fine or a jail term. In addition, a parent who has not paid support can lose his or her driver's license or professional license. Government lawyers may help with collection of child support, though their efficiency varies from state to state. Child support enforcement is a matter of increasing federal concern. Under the Child Support Recovery Act of 1992, it is a federal crime to willfully fail to pay child support to a child who resides in another state if the past-due amount has been unpaid for over one year or exceeds $5,000. Punishments under the federal law can include fines and imprisonment. States also have criminal penalties for failure to pay child support. A parent may not reduce child support payments without a court order: The unpaid amounts will accumulate as a debt, even if a court later decides that there was a good reason for the reduction. American Bar Association Family Legal Guide Copyright © 2004 American Bar Association |
|
|
Family Law Resources -
Children
|
May the custodial parent move out of state with the child?The law on this issue varies from state to state. Some states routinely allow the custodial parent to move out of state with the child if there is a good-faith reason for the move. Many states, however, examine requests to move on a case-by-case basis and decide the issue after considering several factors. Some states also impose notice requirements by which the parent who wants to move with the child must notify the other parent a certain number of days (thirty, sixty, or ninety days) before the proposed move so that the noncustodial parent has an opportunity to challenge the plans for a move. What are good-faith reasons for the move?The most common good-faith reasons for a move are obtaining significantly better employment in another state, following one's new spouse to a new job in another state, and a desire to live near family members. What are the factors a court will consider when deciding whether to allow a move?There are several factors: 1. The quality of the custodial parent's reason for the move. A good-faith reason and a likelihood that allowing the move will enhance the quality of life for the child and custodial parent helps the custodial parent's case. A bad-faith reason, such as a desire to undermine the child's relationship with the noncustodial parent, makes it more likely a court will deny permission to move. 2. The quality of the reasons of the parent opposing the move. A parent who has been very active in the child's life, sees the child often, and wants to preserve that relationship has a stronger case for denying permission to move. A parent who has not seen the child very much, or who often misses visitation, has a weaker case. 3. The quality of the relationship between the child and both parents. 4. The degree to which visitation can be restructured to preserve or foster a good relationship between the child and the nonmoving parent, including the issue of whether substitute visitation is affordable to the parties. American Bar Association Family Legal Guide Copyright © 2004 American Bar Association |
|
Family Law Resources -
Children
|
What is joint custody?Joint custody--sometimes referred to as shared custody or shared parenting--has two parts: joint legal custody and joint physical custody. A joint custody order can have one or both parts. What is joint legal custody?Joint legal custody means that both parents share in major decisions affecting the child. The custody order may describe the issues on which the parents must share decisions. The most common issues are school, health care, and religious training. Other issues on which the parents may make joint decisions include extracurricular activities, summer camp, age for dating or driving, and methods of discipline. Many joint custody orders specify procedures parents should follow in the event they cannot agree on an issue. The most common procedure is for the parents to consult a mediator. What is joint physical custody?Joint physical custody refers to the time the child spends with each parent. The amount of time is flexible. It does not have to be fifty-fifty. The length of time could be relatively moderate, such as every other weekend with one parent; or the amount of time could be equally divided between the parents. Parents who opt for equal time-sharing have come up with many alternatives: alternate two-day periods; equal division of the week; alternate weeks; alternate months; alternate four-month periods; and alternate six-month periods. If the child is attending school and spends a substantial amount of time with both parents, it usually is best for the child if the parents live relatively close to each other. A few parents, on an interim basis, have kept the child in a single home while the parents rotate staying in the home with the child. Are courts required to order joint custody if a parent asks for it?No. In most states, joint custody is an option. Courts may order joint custody or sole custody according to what the judge thinks is in the best interest of the child. In eleven states, legislatures have declared a general preference for joint custody. That usually means the courts are supposed to order joint custody if a parent asks for it, unless there is a good reason for not ordering joint custody. The most common reason for not ordering joint custody is the parents' inability to cooperate. Courts are concerned that a child will be caught in the middle of a tug-of-war if joint custody is ordered for parents who do not cooperate with each other. Parents who do not cooperate also will have trouble with sole custody and visitation, but the frequency of conflicts may be less. If a parent is opposing joint custody because the parent (without good reason) is trying to undermine the child's relationship with the other parent, that could be a factor in granting custody to the other parent. |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
|